SportsReal data · Locked predictions · Public results
REPICOM — Sports intelligence you can verify
|
Sign inJoin free
Value Finder

Screen the board like an analyst.

Every player prop REPICOM evaluated, mapped model against market — with the price, EV, recent form, sample and the reason it did not qualify.

Evaluations
36
With recent form
36
Model above market
15
Qualified · locked
0
Statistical signals

Every evaluation here did not qualify as a REPICOM play. A favourable gap or hit rate is a research signal, not a recommendation.

NO PLAY
Evaluated, did not clear REPICOM's gates. Shown here with its evidence.
Qualified · locked
0 plays for members before the game. Never shown here.
Qualified · released
Public once released — on Top Plays and in Results.
Board map · model vs marketTap a point
35354040454550505555606065657070model = marketMarket implied %REPICOM model %
Model above marketModel at or below market16 plotted
Source & method · as of Oct 26, 10:49 PM ET
Source
Same NO PLAY research rows as the Value Finder list
Statistic
x = market probability, y = REPICOM model probability
Calculation
Points above the diagonal have model > market. Being above the line is not a qualification: confidence, EV and sample gates also apply.
Sample
One point per evaluation with both probabilities
Freshness
Read on every request (no cache)
Missing data
Evaluations missing either probability are excluded from the map and counted below it.
16 of 36 evaluations
Jalen CokerCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsOVER 5.5 · +120
REPICOM model56.2%
Market implied45.5%
Model − market+10.8 pts
EV / 1u+0.237Last 104/6Sample6 gMCP40.2
Cleared the line, last 104/667%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Darren WallerCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsOVER 2.5 · +120
REPICOM model52.7%
Market implied45.5%
Model − market+7.3 pts
EV / 1u+0.160Last 105/10Sample64 gMCP30.2
Cleared the line, last 105/1050%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but MCP consistency did not reach a qualifying band.

Josh JacobsCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsOVER 2.5 · -110
REPICOM model58.5%
Market implied52.4%
Model − market+6.1 pts
EV / 1u+0.116Last 107/10Sample47 gMCP28.4
Cleared the line, last 107/1070%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but MCP consistency did not reach a qualifying band.

Tetairoa McMillanCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsUNDER 5.5 · -140
REPICOM model62.8%
Market implied58.3%
Model − market+4.5 pts
EV / 1u+0.076Last 105/7Sample7 gMCP35
Cleared the line, last 105/771%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Christian WatsonCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsUNDER 4.5 · -120
REPICOM model56.7%
Market implied54.5%
Model − market+2.1 pts
EV / 1u+0.039Last 106/10Sample10 gMCP46.7
Cleared the line, last 106/1060%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Tucker KraftCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsUNDER 4.5 · -130
REPICOM model57.2%
Market implied56.5%
Model − market+0.7 pts
EV / 1u+0.013Last 106/10Sample10 gMCP64.9
Cleared the line, last 106/1060%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Matthew GoldenCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsOVER 4.5 · -140
REPICOM model58.7%
Market implied58.3%
Model − market+0.4 pts
EV / 1u+0.007Last 105/8Sample8 gMCP76.1
Cleared the line, last 105/863%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Chuba HubbardCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsUNDER 2.5 · -170
REPICOM model61.5%
Market implied63.0%
Model − market-1.4 pts
EV / 1u-0.022Last 106/10Sample23 gMCP18
Cleared the line, last 106/1060%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but MCP consistency did not reach a qualifying band.

Chuba HubbardCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsUNDER 2.5 · +130
REPICOM model40.4%
Market implied43.5%
Model − market-3.1 pts
EV / 1u-0.071Last 106/10Sample23 gMCP18
Cleared the line, last 106/1060%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but MCP consistency did not reach a qualifying band.

Jalen CokerCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsOVER 4.5 · +125
REPICOM model40.7%
Market implied44.4%
Model − market-3.7 pts
EV / 1u-0.084Last 104/6Sample6 gMCP40.2
Cleared the line, last 104/667%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Matthew GoldenCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsOVER 4.5 · +110
REPICOM model43.0%
Market implied47.6%
Model − market-4.6 pts
EV / 1u-0.096Last 105/8Sample8 gMCP76.1
Cleared the line, last 105/863%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Tucker KraftCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsUNDER 4.5 · +100
REPICOM model44.7%
Market implied50.0%
Model − market-5.3 pts
EV / 1u-0.106Last 106/10Sample10 gMCP64.9
Cleared the line, last 106/1060%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Christian WatsonCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsUNDER 4.5 · -110
REPICOM model45.4%
Market implied52.4%
Model − market-7.0 pts
EV / 1u-0.133Last 106/10Sample10 gMCP46.7
Cleared the line, last 106/1060%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Tetairoa McMillanCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsUNDER 5.5 · +110
REPICOM model39.0%
Market implied47.6%
Model − market-8.6 pts
EV / 1u-0.181Last 105/7Sample7 gMCP35
Cleared the line, last 105/771%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but the player does not meet the 20-game publication history floor.

Josh JacobsCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsOVER 2.5 · -120
REPICOM model43.6%
Market implied54.5%
Model − market-10.9 pts
EV / 1u-0.200Last 107/10Sample47 gMCP28.4
Cleared the line, last 107/1070%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but MCP consistency did not reach a qualifying band.

Darren WallerCarolina Panthers@Green Bay PackersThu 8:15 PM ET
NO PLAY
receptionsOVER 2.5 · -150
REPICOM model48.9%
Market implied60.0%
Model − market-11.1 pts
EV / 1u-0.185Last 105/10Sample64 gMCP30.2
Cleared the line, last 105/1050%
Count of hits in the sample, not an ordered game log.
Why it did not qualify

Model signal exists, but MCP consistency did not reach a qualifying band.