Model probability
See the validated production probability when an exact supported market is available.
REPICOM is designed to challenge supported individual legs with real production evidence instead of giving you a vague yes-or-no answer. When validated evidence exists, you can compare the model with the market and inspect the reasons that support or oppose the selection.
See the validated production probability when an exact supported market is available.
Compare the model with the captured or entered market price to understand the direction and size of the difference.
Where available, MCP and recent-performance evidence show repeatability separately from the wager probability.
REPICOM keeps the evidence that argues against the play visible so uncertainty is not hidden.
If REPICOM cannot match a leg to validated production evidence, the answer is insufficient data. That protects the analysis from false precision. It also means a combined parlay probability is not displayed merely by multiplying individual numbers when dependence between the legs has not been validated.
After you save a supported evaluation, the Prediction Ledger preserves the pregame record. You can return after the event to compare what REPICOM knew before the game with what actually happened.
A higher model probability does not automatically make a leg appropriate, and a lower market probability is not automatically an error. The useful question is whether the production evidence, price and consistency information point in the same direction and whether the exact player, team, side and line are supported. REPICOM is designed to expose those pieces separately so you can see where the case is strong and where it is uncertain.
For manual entries, the safest outcome can be no exact match. That means the production system does not have a validated record for the requested market at that line. REPICOM keeps that as insufficient data rather than turning a nearby market or historical average into a substitute probability.